The decay of the media and the rise of the silent majority
Journalism
has in recent years become more and more barefaced in their attempts to push a
leftist political agenda. Not satisfied being Pravda, the media intends to
police the Overton window by compulsion where it cannot persuade, using tactics
not unfamiliar to the Stasi or the Maoist Cultural Revolutionary Guards –
shaming, doxing, bullying, and getting people fired.
Take
the grey lady the New York Times. Just
in July this year, it has seen the forced
resignation of a senior editor James Bennet for
publishing a commentary
by Republican senator Tom Cotton. Cotton argued for the use of state troops to
end the increasingly violent
and lawless
lootings and riots in multiple cities after the death of George Floyd.
Buildings damaged or destroyed in Minneapolis and Saint Paul - data from the Star Tribune
Whether
you agree with Cotton’s view or not, an opinion piece by a prominent legislator
seems reasonable for a publication that has the unselfconscious claim of ‘All
the News That’s Fit to Print’.
What’s
more, an Ipsos/ABC
News poll and a Morning
Consult poll conducted in early June showed that the
majority (52% and 58% respectively) agreed with the use of troops to quell
violent riots. So the NYT fired its own editor for simply airing the opinion of
an elected Republican senator that also happens to reflect the majority view.
Days
later, centrist journalist Bari Weiss resigned, citing
“bullying by colleagues” at the NYT. In her resignation letter, Weiss wrote of
the NYT that: “[ ] Twitter has
become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have
become those of the paper, the paper itself has increasingly become a kind of
performance space. Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the
narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the
world and then draw their own conclusions.”
A MSNBC producer, Ariana Pekary, quit on the 24th
of July, citing a TV
veteran who told her “We are the cancer and there is no cure.” She went on to
say that “the model blocks diversity of thought and content because the
networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of
others…all because it pumps up the ratings.” For these reasons, Pekary said
that “I don’t know what I’m going to do next exactly but I simply couldn’t stay
there anymore.”
The
same can be said of the publically funded BBC in the UK. Between the years
2005-2015, when discussing the Brexit
vote,
the BBC invited overwhelmingly more anti-Brexit than pro-Brexit guests (4,275
vs 132), on the Today program alone,
according to the Institute of Economic Affairs.
The
BBC also saw fit to lambast Dominic Cummings, the pro-Brexit Tory advisor, for taking a car trip
to be nearer his parents during the coronavirus shutdown, a trip that the
police concluded did
not breach the shutdown laws. But you’ll have a hard time
finding one piece critical of the hundreds of BLM protests in the UK who clearly
breached shutdown laws.
Journalists breaking quarantine rules while accusing Cummings of breaking quarantine rules
This
metastasising bias is why the ABC News ran the gloriously Panglossian Tweet:
“Protestors in California set fire to a courthouse, damaged a police station
and assaulted officers after a peaceful demonstration intensified.”
This is also why, after more than 50 days of nightly riots, the Portland Mayor was invited on to CNN to say that rather than his consistently weak policies, it is the Department of Homeland Security troops, which the federal government sent in specifically to protect federal buildings from being set alight, who are causing the violence, contrary to all facts.
The
current state puts in mind an observation of W.H. Auden, who noted propaganda
to be “a monologue that is not looking for an answer, but an echo.”
The
leftward
shift of the mass media has been evident for many
years. In the US, a survey saw the proportion of
Republicans within journalism shrink from 25.7% in 1971 to 7.1% in 2014. In the
UK, a Pew
report found 60% of BBC audience identified as Liberal,
with only 13% identifying as Conservative.
What
is concerning is that this radicalisation of the media might be the tail that
is wagging the dog. A Pew
report showed that while the median Conservative in the US
has largely maintained their ideological positions, the median Democrat has
veered sharply to the extreme left over the last 20 odd years.
In
turn, the ideology
of House candidates who won their primaries similarly has
shifted substantially left among Democrats compared to the static Republicans
over a similar period.
This
radicalisation should be alarming. A 2019
King’s College London study found that adherence to extreme
left wing ideology is linked to sympathies for violent extremism. Indeed, Thomas
Paine and Edmund Burke knew this during the French Revolution. Orwell realised
this in the 1930’s. And anyone who had studied the Stalinist Purge, Mao’s
Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot’s killing fields, or the repressions in Cuba and
Venezuela today should know that extremism of the left can be every bit as deadly
as extremism on the right.
Yet
the general culture of the West is such that while wearing a T-shirt with a
swastika will lead to unanimous repudiation and possible hate-crime charges,
one can wear a T-shirt with the hammer and sickle with no reprisal. Given this,
the leftward biased reporting and tolerance from politicians of violence in the
recent US riots, particularly in Democrat
run cities, is not surprising. Follow Andy Ngo for some street-level reporting of the vile things the 'peaceful protesters' are up to nightly.
The attempt of the mainstream media to create a
consensus a thousand miles wide and a millimetre deep shows the complacency,
mean spiritedness and arrogance to the public, in the face of their own perceived
power.
But
in today’s technological age, the media no longer has the monopoly on news and
interpretations. Signs increasingly suggest that the public has begun to see
through the spin.
A
2018
Gallup Poll found that trust in the newspaper and
television press is among the lowest of all institutions surveyed. A
Knight Foundation and Gallup Poll also found that the
majority (69%) of adults has lost confidence in News Media over the past 10
years. This ranged from 95% of Conservatives to 46% Liberals. A 2018 Rasmussen
Report of likely voters found that 45% think that
reporters are favouring the Democratic candidate when reporting on
congressional races, whereas only 11% think that they’re trying to help
Republicans.
A recent Cato Institute poll found that amazingly 62% of Americans have political views they are
afraid to share. The only group where a majority feel able to freely express
their political views are ‘strong Liberals’ at 58%. A
silent majority is likely to be more than a catchphrase but a statistical fact.
This
pent up resentment has led to costs to these dishonest publications and
broadcasters. In 2019, almost
8,000 people, largely from very leftist institutions
like Huffington Post, NBC, Washington Post and VICE, had lost their
jobs. BBC News viewership has dropped
by 7 million over the past 7 years.
They
are also paying in many other ways for their unchecked and often hubristic biases.
Nick Sandmann, the teenager caught up in a horrendous
media smear storm, based on prejudice and lies, has
successfully settled with Washington Post
for a $250M
defamation lawsuit in July. This is in addition to
settling with CNN in January. Sandmann is also suing ABC, NBC, The Guardian, The Huffington Post and Slate
among others.
The modern Leftist media has lost all that made
the Left noble while inheriting and magnifying all its flaws. It has become
reactionary, parochial, unkind, strangely conformist and dogmatic in its
insistence on groupthink while being stubbornly incapable of admitting guilt.
It has become more and more totalitarian. But unlike Winston Smith in 1984, it seems that the average person
will not likely comply with their dictatorial wishes. So much for the better.
Comments
Post a Comment